It is possible to analyse land reforms using a variety of frameworks. The most common one found in literature, especially among those concerned about the economy, is to link the land reform debate with the objective of achieving agricultural growth. For others who are concerned with rights, the purpose is to ensure land rights and poverty alleviation. In recent times the notion of rights based development has helped to propagate this approach.
This essay on the politics of land reforms in Sri Lanka takes a different path. Its main thrust is to link the politics of land reform in Sri Lanka with the project of state building during the post-colonial period. States are not only a collection of institutions and functions. They are based on ideas. The ruling classes that dominate these states expect these ideas to ensure the coherence of the state. Ideas to ensure coherence of states can originate from different sources. In recent times, because of the prominence given to political Islam, there is a discussion about religious identities and state formation. Building states based on a religious identity is the objective of Islamic movements.
The paper begins with the assumption that it is possible to analyse different doctrines of development from a similar angle. Doctrines of development have served the purpose of state building. For the ruling classes they have been a key instrument is forging relations with critical sections of society, so that the stability and coherence of the state can be maintained. Therefore a significant objective of development policies is not only to achieve the policy goals that it has set itself, but also to forge a relationship between the rulers and the ruled so that the state is secure.
The objective of this paper is to analyse the politics of land polices and land reforms as an element in state building in Sri Lanka. It argues that the state building project of the post-colonial period was based on a special relationship with rural Sri Lanka, dominated by the majority Sinhala population. It gave special emphasis to the development of rural areas and agriculture. Within this overall framework, paddy agriculture was given a special place. Protecting the Sinhala peasantry as a class, and improving the lot of the small holder paddy growing farmer, became principal objectives of development. This became a central idea in the post-colonial state building project. The objective of land policies and land reforms was to translate this idea into reality.
Sustaining a state in conflict: Politics of foreign aid in Sri Lanka, Colombo:ICES, (2018)
This study focuses on politics of foreign aid to Sri Lanka from developed countries of the West, Japan and multilateral agencies during the period 1977 to end of the armed conflict in 2009. This period is characterised by economic policies that emphasised liberal economic policies and an armed conflict resulting from the Tamil demand for a separate state. The study looks at politics of foreign aid in this context. Foreign aid played a dual role. It helped to sustain a state engaged in an armed conflict, while at the same time trying to promote a negotiated settlement. Therefore it was neither a do-gooder that liberals tend to believe nor a 'foreign devil that Sinhala nationalists like to see.
Can democracy be designed?
(2003) Co-editor, Can Democracy be Designed? London: Zed Books.
Assessing participation - A debate from south asia
(1997) Co-editor, Assessing Participation: A Debate from South Asia. New Delhi: ITDG/Konark Publishers.
The politics of foreign Aid in Sri Lanka
(2007) Politics of foreign aid in Sri Lanka, Promoting markets and supporting peace. Colombo: International Centre for Ethnic Studies.
(1999) Poverty Alleviation through Smallholder Agriculture – Fighting a Loosing Battle?
(2003) Foreign Aid, Globalisation and Conflict in Sri Lanka.
Some thoughts on politics of foreign aid
Copyright @ 2024 Sunil Bastian.